FileBolt vs MASV: 2026 Large File Delivery for Cost Control, Limits, and Client Experience
Compare FileBolt and MASV for large file transfer and secure delivery in 2026: pricing in USD, usage-based costs, file size limits, retention, and the best scenarios for sending big video files to clients.
MASV is popular in media production because it can handle huge deliveries and is often priced per GB. That is strong when you run occasional, project-based deliveries and want a clean, billable cost model. But when the workflow becomes “weekly client delivery of big video files,” usage-based costs can grow quickly and become less predictable.
FileBolt uses a delivery-tier model: clear file size limits and retention that scale by plan. This makes it easier to budget for repeated large file transfer and consistent client delivery.
1) Pricing (USD): usage-based cost vs delivery tiers
FileBolt: delivery-focused tiers (USD)
| Plan | Price | Max file size | Retention | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 10 GB / file | 3 days | No email required · 60 transfers / month |
| Education (3-year) | $1.50 / month | 100 GB / file | 7 days | Unlimited transfers |
| Pro (3-year) | $4.50 / month | 300 GB / file | 15 days | Password + download limits |
| Premium (3-year) | $15 / month | 1 TB / file | 30 days | Recipient uploads + custom legal terms |
| Business (3-year) | $30 / month | 2 TB / file | 60 days | Custom branding |
| Enterprise (3-year) | $65 / month | 5 TB / file | 60 days | Custom branding |
MASV: billing rules (USD)
| Item | Rule | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly free transfer allowance | 15 GB / month | Good for testing and small deliveries |
| Pay-As-You-Go transfer price | $0.25 / GB (over 15 GB) | Costs scale with delivered GB |
| Free storage period | 5 days | After that, storage is billed |
| Extended storage fee | $0.07 / GB-month (after 5 days) | Long retention can add recurring cost |
| Max single file size | 15 TB / file | Very high ceiling for massive masters |
MASV monthly cost examples (PAYG, USD)
The table below illustrates the cost curve for pay-as-you-go delivery. When your monthly delivered GB increases, the bill increases linearly. This can be great for project billing, but less ideal for stable monthly budgets.
| Scenario | Delivered volume | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|
| 100 GB delivered in a month | 100 GB | $21.25 |
| 300 GB delivered in a month | 300 GB | $71.25 |
| 500 GB delivered in a month | 500 GB | $121.25 |
| 1 TB delivered in a month (1024 GB) | 1024 GB | $252.25 |
If your work is frequent delivery, FileBolt’s tiered plans can flatten monthly cost and simplify quoting. If your work is occasional huge deliveries that you charge per project, MASV’s pay-as-you-go model can fit well.
Conclusion: which one should you choose?
- Choose MASV if your delivery is project-based, extremely large, and you want per-GB billing to pass through to clients.
- Choose FileBolt if you want predictable budgets and a delivery-first workflow for repeated large file transfer—especially for big video files.
Data sources & last verified
We aim to keep this comparison accurate. Limits and pricing can change. Last verified: 2026-01-28.
- MASV official pricing / plan details: massive.io
- FileBolt official pricing / plan details: filebolt.net/pricing
Note: We reference vendor pages where possible. If you spot an outdated number, please tell us and we’ll update it.
How we compare (a simple, reproducible checklist)
“Fast” and “reliable” mean different things across workflows. When evaluating a large file transfer tool for real delivery work, we recommend checking the items below for your own network and file sizes:
- File size ceiling: maximum per-file / per-transfer limit (e.g., 10 GB, 250 GB, 300 GB).
- Stability on unstable networks: resumable uploads/downloads, chunking, retries, and partial failures.
- Recipient experience: no forced sign-up, fewer steps, and predictable download speed.
- Governance: download counts, expiry control, access restrictions, and audit-friendly logs.
- Cost model: what you actually pay for (transfer vs. active storage) and what happens when you exceed limits.
Tip: For speed comparisons, test the same file (10–50 GB) across the same route (e.g., JP→US or EU→US) and record median time across 3 runs.
FAQ
Is MASV a good choice for sending large files?
It can be, depending on your file sizes, retention needs, and whether your recipients can tolerate extra steps. If you routinely deliver very large projects, look closely at per-file limits, expiry/retention rules, and whether transfers are resumable.
When is FileBolt a better fit than MASV?
FileBolt is typically a better fit when you need faster delivery, larger per-file limits, real-time transfer visibility, and a simpler recipient flow (including sharing a link without forcing the recipient to register).
What should I test before switching?
Test a representative file size (e.g., 10 GB and 50 GB), measure end-to-end time, and verify whether downloads can resume after interruption. Also check how your team uses retention and whether you need recipient uploads or team collaboration.